/
Interface process not including Maintenance Contract (MC) on Work Orders (WO)
Interface process not including Maintenance Contract (MC) on Work Orders (WO)
Issue/Symptom/Question
It seems that when posting to work orders through the general journal interface, the MC ID is not automatically picked up by PENTA to post the transaction as covered by the MC. How can we post through the general journal interface in a way that would include the transactions as covered by the MC?
Applies To
PENTA for Windows
Interfaces > Journal Entry Interfacing
Resolution/Fix/Answer
The current interface functionality excludes the maintenance contract id. This is because the work order being charged, may not also be charging the maintenance contract. If the maintenance contract is to be charged along with the work order, then the field maint_contract_id would need to be included in the interface file.
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Interfaces at a Glance
Interfaces at a Glance
Read with this
Automatically get reimbursements to show up in the activity logs
Automatically get reimbursements to show up in the activity logs
More like this